Living in Jersey is tough if you're a republican, but what if your in a prep school where the majority of teachers and students are liberal? Welcome to the world of a Republican Man Blue Land

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Que es esto? Liberals have new criticism about Senor Bush!

The Liberals have tried everything to jump on President Bush. Whether it be his sagging poll numbers(a topic for another post) or his Iraq strategy, the Liberals have been in complaint mode for almost 6 years now. This new complaint that the Democrats are hatching is that President Bush speaks Spanish and sung the national anthem in Spanish during the campaign. This is by far the worst excuse for complaining about a President. The only reason this topic has arisen is because the Liberals are trying to get America to hate Bush. With the economy improving, the government in Iraq stabilizing, the Democrats need something to stir up controversy for this election season. With the problems the Democrats are having, namely Ted Kennedy's blocking of green energy in Cape Cod and Mayor Ray Nagin's dwindling attempts to retake a post-Katrina New Orleans, the Liberals do not really have anything positive to commend themselves on. Instead, they attack the conservatives for speaking Spanish and attempting to solve the energy crisis while the Dems just sit there and YAK YAK YAK. President Bush does not speak Spanish well and that is the final straw. Don't you think that when he went to Spain and Mexico for meeting he would have spoken to the leaders in Spanish instead of using a translator! I don't know how Kevin Phillips, the author who came up with the story that President Bush speaks Spanish, ever conjured up this notion that he does! Unless Kevin Phillips talks to President Bush on a regular basis, I don't believe his story for a minute. The only reason Kevin Phillips said this is because he is trying to boost sales of his new book and figured, might as well stir up some controversy with this story. When are the Dems going to figure out the actions speak louder than word! Comprende?

Sunday, April 30, 2006

ABC stands for A Bias Channel

As I sat down with my family to watch the uplifting "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition," a commercial appeared with depictions of people becoming sick and mass hysteria. You would think that it was in some distant country, like Africa with the Ebola virus. One might even say it was Europe with the Mad-Cow Disease but that was not the case. Instead, the country with the mass hysteria was the United States, the disease, Bird Flu. I stood there shocked when ABC presented me with a new movie called "Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America." This movie is designed to show what effects the Bird Flu will have on the United States.
I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that ABC made this movie to demonstrate George Bush not caring about the Bird Flu epidemic but is there really a threat? Recent articles from the New York Times, a liberal newspaper by the way, stated that the Bird Flu has to go through several mutations before it will become a major pandemic. As of right now, the virus can not be easily transmitted from person to person but rather, a person would have to eat meat in order to contract this disease. Unless ABC is withholding information from us, there story is very far from being plausible. The main reason that ABC is showing this movie is for the mighty rating points. Since the average American doesn't know much about the Avian Bird Flu, they might become frightened by this movie and take the information that they just seen as scripture instead of the truth. Americans might jump to conclusions and start to blame George Bush for not preparing America better. If you want to beat the bird flu, I offer you this simple yet effective advice. WASH YOUR HANDS!!! RP

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Honoring the dead or Honoring the party: How Libs Bring Their Bias Everywhere.

While many people were paying their respects to Coretta Scott King in Atlanta, some people, namely Jimmy Carter and Reverend Lowery, decided to use this time to criticize President Bush, who was in attendance in Atlanta where the funeral was held. Lowery criticized President Bush's spending on the Iraq War by saying, "For war, billions more, but no more for the poor," while Jimmy Carter jabbed at President Bush's wire-tapping program by stating that the Kings were "victims of secret government wiretapping." Instead of paying their respects like many of the people at the funeral, Carter and Lowery used this event as a opportunity to heckle Bush. I can't believe that these men would do something to a President Republican or not. A funeral is defined as a ceremony or group of ceremonies held in connection with the burial or cremation of a dead person, not a ceremony held to heckle people. Carter, one of the worst Presidents in my opinion, was to soft when it came to handling terrorists unlike President Bush who is pre-emptive. Carter had to deal with terrorists once during his tenor as president. What end up happening was a year long hostage situation, where Carter did not attempt to rescue these American citizens. The release of the hostages came when Reagan took over and did not mess with the hostages. Lowery shouldn't talk about President Bush in that manner during a service. After all, he is a minister and I think he would know how to act during a Church service. The message that I have to Liberals is this: Please, leave your political views outside of a Church. God doesn't care what party your affiliated with, and critizing is not very Christian-like. George Bush did follow Jesus' teachings and turned the other cheek while these two men tarnished his name.

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Hypocrisy in Action: Hillary and Her Big Mouth

Hillary Clinton should take a lesson from her husband. When you gain much attention for doing something stupid, you stay away from the spotlight for awhile but Hillary is not like that. First, she stated that Congress was being run like a "plantation." Now, she is criticizing George Bush for "playing the fear card on terrorism" and not capturing "the tallest man in Afghanistan" which was referring to Osama Bin Laden. Hillary once again is demonstrating the classic Liberal philosophy of forgetting the past and finding everything wrong with the GOP party.
Hillary is showing that she is such a hypocrite with these statements. When her husband was in power only 6 years ago, Bin Laden was offered by the Pakistani Government but he refused to capture him. Bill Clinton did not want him and let this madman run free and commit some of the worst terrorists acts on US soil and abroad. The bombing of the USS Cole and the bombing of a embassy were committed. What did Clinton do after these travesties? Nothing, he did not do anything. To say that George Bush is "playing the fear card" while her husband did nothing is such hypocrisy. George Bush actually sent troops to both Afghanistan and Iraq to catch these terrorists before they strike again. The Bush Administration has captured more terrorists then Clinton and furthermore prevented another 9-11 by being pre-emptive. In a recent article published, George Bush stated that the administration has foiled a total of 10 serious terrorist plots, including the destruction of the US Bank Tower. If Hillary Clinton is planning to make a serious run at the presidency in 2008, she better stop opening her big mouth or it will be another win for the GOP, and I have no problem with that.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

State of the Union or State of New Orleans?

After President Bush's State of the Union Address on Tuesday night, many of the hosts of the prime time shows were mad that Bush only spoke about the situation in Katrina for a little bit. Why didn't he speak longer? Were the cries of the people in that devastated region. The reason why Bush did not spend much time on this topic is because the State of the Union has to do with the entire country and not just one region. The State of the Union address always has more pros then cons in it anyway. The Bush Administration has devoted hours upon hours of support to the Katrina Victims already. The administration already has pledged 85 billion dollars of support to the victims, so what more do they want? The disaster in New Orleans was tragic, there is no doubt about that, but since September there have been more hard pressing issues on the President's mind. The election of the nuclear crazy president in Iran, the election of Hamas in Palestein and the pursuit of a new judge to the Supreme Court just to name a few. If the Katrina Victims are so concerned that they are not receiving any attention from the government, they should be hard pressing against people like Mayor Ray Nagin and Katherine Blanco, who deserve much of the blame. Nagin is currently in Washington D.C. being investigated about the Katrina response. Nagin still blames FEMA for most of his faults. Nagin should have been better prepared and had food and water supplies ready at both the Superdome and Convention Center. I think the President did a great job on his State of the Union. He touched every pressing issue throughout the United States and told Americans what he plans to do to fix the problems of the world.

Friday, January 27, 2006

Filibuster or filibust! Those Mixed up Senators from MA.

John Kerry and Ted Kennedy are back in the news again. Both of the left-wing boys from Massachusetts are calling to filibuster the vote to approve Judge Samuel Alito. Kerry stated that, "Judge Alito's confirmation would be an ideological coup on the Supreme Court." Ted Kennedy agrees with Kerry assumption by saying that, "Judge Alito does not share the values of equality and justice that makes this country strong."
It's obvious that the only reason that these two men don't support Judge Alito is because they are liberals. John Kerry is worried about his image and doesn't support Alito because he is probably going to run for president in 2008. Ted Kennedy has also been quite outspoken during the confirmation hearings, where Senator Arlen Spector told him to settle down. I think both Kerry and Kennedy should just be quiet and stop playing the partisan politics game like Sen. Robert Byrd, who talked about partisan politics by saying he is going to "toe the party line when it comes to Supreme Court justices." Alito also has a great background and would be perfect for the job. Alito attended Yale law school and wrote for the paper there. Samuel Alito also served for 15 years at the US Department of Justice. Alito also served as a judge on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for 15 years. Alito does not have a political bias and rules based on existing laws and facts. Alito is more than qualified to be on the Supreme Court but the liberals do not support him because George Bush nominated him. The liberals make outrageous claims that can't be supported by facts. It is time to stop playing the "he isn't in my political party" card and start acting on gut feeling. Kerry and Kennedy only didn't support Alito because they would lose their liberal fan base.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

"Peace Mom" and those "Meddling" Americans

Cindy Sheehan, fresh off her "Great" book turnout at the Crawford ranch, is now in Venezuela helping glorify the leftist president Hugo Chavez. Sheehan calls for the end of the Iraq war and for the U.S. to stop quote, "meddling," in foreign affairs. Sheehan, along with 10,000 others made the trek to Venezuela to protest the war and launch the World Social Forum.
It seems to me like Cindy Sheehan is such a diplomat nowadays. After all, she wanted to speak with President Bush (which never happened) and now she supports a leftist president in South America and is protesting the war in Iraq from there. The reason why she went to South America with her 10,000 liberal friends to protest the war is because she can't do it in America anymore. Americans are sick and tired of her and her liberal ideals. A grieving mother deserves her opinion on the war but she must realize that her son went over there because he wanted to. Many of the young men and women in Iraq volunteered to go over to Iraq to fight terrorism. Sheehan decision to go to Venezuela demonstrates that she is not just campaigning to end the war in Iraq but wants to have an influence on every foreign affair. Sheehan has gone to far in my opinion by supporting Chavez. Chavez allies himself with Castro and communist Cuba, where democracy and freedoms that we have don't even exists. Sheehan also called for America to stop "meddling" in foreign affairs. The U.S. has become the police of the world and it is too late to stop now. America is the last superpower in the world and so it is our obligation to be in foreign affairs. America had no need to be in Serbia in the 1990s but because of the genocide we stepped in and stopped a ruthless dictator. America is going to be "meddling" in foreign affairs and continue doing so until the end of time whether Cindy likes it or not. It is time for Sheehan to just get out of politics before she gets herself in trouble but it may be too late.